£8.3bn energy gamble: Will Great British Energy save struggling families or just line corporate pockets?
Critics warn Labour’s flagship energy scheme risks leaving millions out in the cold
It was the headline-grabbing promise that sparked hope across the country: “We’ll cut your energy bills by £300 a year.”
But months on from Labour’s grand launch of Great British Energy (GBE), many are asking: Where’s the saving? Where’s the help? And most of all – who is this really for?
Because behind the bold pledges and green slogans, there’s a worrying truth: GBE isn’t here to lower your bill any time soon. In fact, most Brits won’t notice a thing, at least not in the short term.
And with £8.3 billion of taxpayers’ money on the line, critics are now demanding answers. Will this be the energy revolution Ed Miliband promised? Or another Whitehall fantasy that leaves working families out in the cold – literally?
Not a supplier, not a lifeline
Let’s get one thing straight. Despite the name, GBE isn’t an energy company like British Gas or EDF.
It won’t offer you a cheaper tariff. It won’t put a penny in your pocket this winter. And no – you can’t switch to it.
Instead, GBE is a state-backed investment fund, set up to throw money into energy projects that the private sector thinks are too risky or too slow to pay off.
We’re talking offshore wind farms, long-term grid upgrades, and new tech that might work in ten years' time.
Sound good on paper? Sure.
But if you’re a single mum juggling bills, or a pensioner freezing in a draughty flat, this does absolutely nothing for you right now.
The lofty ambitions and the stark reality
GBE is meant to fix three big problems in our energy system. One, new green tech getting stuck in the funding black hole between invention and rollout. Two, crumbling infrastructure needing billions to rebuild. Three, a chaotic market where nobody seems to be on the same page.
In theory, GBE steps in where banks and investors won’t by taking the early risks, then letting business follow once the hard work’s done.
But Britain’s poorest can’t afford to wait for theory. They need help now.
Bills are still sky-high. Energy debts are piling up. And yet the government’s shiny new energy project seems more interested in floating wind turbines than freezing families.
Where’s the help for ordinary Brits?
Let’s be blunt: this country is in the middle of a fuel poverty crisis.
Millions are still living in homes that leak heat, relying on expensive prepayment meters and rationing hot water to save money.
So where’s GBE’s plan to fix that?
Why isn’t that £8.3bn being used to insulate Britain’s coldest homes, replace clapped-out boilers with clean heat pumps or slash standing charges that punish the poorest most?
Right now, it looks like the government is obsessed with impressing investors and big energy firms while the real people footing the bill are being ignored.
A company with no customers and no community voice
And here’s another red flag. GBE talks a big game about being “for the people”, but the truth is, it’s run entirely by Westminster and the buddies they appoint.
There’s no public board. No community oversight. No role for local councils or energy users. Just another top-down scheme with Whitehall suits calling the shots.
If this really is “Great British” energy, why does it feel so far removed from ordinary British lives?
A missed opportunity or a ticking time bomb?
To be fair, GBE could still do something bold. It could put Britain on the map as a leader in clean energy. It could bring back the idea of public investment with purpose.
But that only works if the benefits are felt on the ground, not just in corporate boardrooms or green tech expos.
Right now, the signs aren’t promising.
While GBE is busy funding solar panels for schools and cutting deals with offshore developers, millions of low-income families are still waiting for the help they were promised.
Deliver or face the backlash
Let’s be crystal clear: this isn’t just about energy. It’s about fairness.
If GBE becomes yet another government project that talks green but acts grey, the backlash will be fierce.
Because hard-working Brits are fed up with lofty pledges that never materialise. They’re tired of being told to “wait and see” while their energy bills eat up too much of their wages.
Ed Miliband and Labour say GBE is here to change the game.
Well, the game needs changing, for those who need it most.
That means real help for those living in fuel poverty, warm homes (not just wind farms), and a seat at the table for communities (not just corporations).
Because if this is truly Great British Energy, it needs to put Great British families first, not leave them behind.
Will GBE deliver the energy revolution we were promised or just become another government white elephant? Only time will tell. But for Britain’s poorest, the clock is already ticking.
Oh wow, what a way to drop the ball. Not that there’s anything wrong with the portfolio GBE is given but the branding and the promises don’t add up.
1) just call it an innovation support fund or something. UK Energy Innovation Fund would talk about what it’s doing much better than the current name
2) a different vehicle should be set up to help people where they are now, regardless if they need help insulating their home or need an upgraded power line so they can get an EV or an induction stove
3) both 1 and 2 should have an explicit mandate to try to crowd in private investment so the money goes further
I guess ultimately it ends up just showing how the government is (wrongly) thinking about climate change and energy and how they might still think it’s about new technology rather than just rapidly implementing technology that’s well known at this point. That might have a lot to do with spending too much time around clever people at fancy universities whose job it is to push the envelope on technology regardless of practicality - the practical people are those in the trades after all.
It’s also worth pointing out that even if the world is rapidly electrifying and the destination and direction is clear, the speed is not and choosing a slower road with more technical risk (as happens here) ultimately just puts the UK in the slow lane as companies choose where to invest and people can’t spend money on new goods and services because their power bill is too expensive.